Week of

 

Dec. 21  to
Dec. 27, 2006

 
 
Progreso Semanal
Lea la versión en español
 
 

 

 

 

Eye on Miami

Features

Links

Suggested readings

Your letters

Bulletin Board

Previous editions

Progreso Weekly©

 
Copyright 2007
© Progreso Weekly, Inc.
 

 
Back to top
 
 

Please join us by subscribing to Progreso Weekly and Progreso Semanal. It's free and easy :      


HOME               LISTEN              ABOUT US              SEARCH             TO EDITOR            TAKE ACTION             CONTRIBUTE


Lea la versión en Español

Print this article   -   E-mail this page


Augusto Pinochet

Augusto Pinochet, 1915-2006

 

(This editorial appeared in The Boston Globe Tuesday, December 12, 2006.)

 

It would be a mistake to regard the death Sunday of Chile's onetime military dictator, Augusto Pinochet, as simply the final fading note of a vanished era. The crimes of that time -- the overthrow of Socialist Salvador Allende's elected government and the human rights abuses that followed -- left vestiges that linger, not only for Chileans but also for Americans.

 

On the day of his death, Pinochet's backers and opponents demonstrated vehemently and sometimes violently. Although Chile has revived the proud democratic traditions Pinochet sought to crush, there was no mistaking the clash between those celebrating the dictator's death and those mourning it.

 

In America, the danger is not that too much is remembered of the Pinochet era but that too much of the American role in helping to foment those old horrors may be forgotten.

 

There is a deceptively comforting story line that sequesters the present from the past, disguising any continuity between the regime change produced in Chile on Sept. 11, 1973, and other American experiments of that nature. In that reassuring historical narrative, Pinochet was perhaps guilty of trampling on democratic niceties and of kidnapping, torturing, and killing socialists and Marxists , but he represented, after all, the lesser of two evils. The alternative evil was commonly depicted as Soviet influence, left-wing radicalism, the expropriation of private property, and falling pro-American dominoes across Latin America.

 

The former US ambassador to the United Nations, Jeane Kirkpatrick, who passed away three days before Pinochet, once propounded a theory to justify American backing for military dictatorships in Latin America. Her rationale rested upon a distinction between totalitarian states like those in the communist world and mere authoritarian regimes. The latter were supposed to be more tolerable because, in contrast to the communist states, they left open the possibility of eventually permitting a return to democracy. It was a theory that failed the test of time, as demonstrated by the nearly bloodless implosion of communism and the flowering of democracy in Poland, Hungary, and the former Czechoslovakia.

 

Reflecting the spirit of such Cold War notions, a CIA document from the month after Allende was elected president on Sept. 11, 1970, says, "It is firm and continuing policy that Allende be overthrown by a coup" and "it is imperative that these actions be implemented clandestinely and securely so that the USG" -- US government -- "and American hand be well hidden." Whatever the details of US complicity in Pinochet's eventual seizure of power, Americans must not forget that their own democratic leaders share complicity in the disappearances, torture, and killings perpetrated after 1973 by their man in Chile. 

 

 

 


E-mail this page
 
Print this article
 
Back to top