Week of

 

Dec. 21  to
Dec. 27, 2006

 
 
Progreso Semanal
Lea la versión en español
 
 

 

 

 

Eye on Miami

Features

Links

Suggested readings

Your letters

Bulletin Board

Previous editions

Progreso Weekly©

 
Copyright 2007
© Progreso Weekly, Inc.
 

 
Back to top
 
 

Please join us by subscribing to Progreso Weekly and Progreso Semanal. It's free and easy :      


HOME               LISTEN              ABOUT US              SEARCH             TO EDITOR            TAKE ACTION             CONTRIBUTE


Lea la versión en Español

Print this article   -   E-mail this page


Al

The contradictory Mr. Uribe

 

What does the Colombian president want?

 

By Matías Mongan

mmongan@prensamercosur.com.ar

 

Just as several paramilitary commanders appeared ready to tell the truth about their links with the political power, the government of Álvaro Uribe arranged for their removal to the Itagüi maximum-security prison.

 

The ramifications of "parapolitics" continue to surprise all of Colombia, to the point that federal prosecutors ordered the arrest of the former president of the Deportivo Pereira soccer club, Ramón Ríos.

 

The prosecutors also interrogated soccer players Rafael Castillo and Luis Felipe Chará to find out if money-laundering operations by the paramilitary organizations are behind the sale of soccer players to foreign teams.

 

As part of the investigation, the Supreme Court of Justice summoned Miguel de la Espriella to give more explanations about his links with the paramilitary group United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC). The Congressman, an ally of President Uribe (who admitted meeting with AUC leaders in 2001), also will have to respond to charges made by the Attorney General, Mario Iguarán, in connection with two checks made out to De la Espriella by drug trafficker Luis Enrique Ramírez, a partner of the late chief of the Medellín cartel, Pablo Escobar.

 

Previously, De la Espriella also was implicated in another scandal that produced a grave crisis in the Colombian political system: the so-called "Process 8000." The scandal implicated then-President Ernesto Samper, accused of receiving funding from drug traffickers for his election campaign. Eventually, Samper and De la Espriella (who, according to some witnesses, was the man who received the money) were exonerated.

 

In statements to the National Radio Network, the legislator said he will release a document written after a 1998 meeting between several political leaders and the main leaders of the AUC. "I'm going to release that document today, and I call on the people who have the document from the 2001 meeting to turn it over to the competent authorities, because it is part of the truth that we all should know," De la Espriella said.

 

On many occasions, President Uribe has emphasized the need for all State functionaries to "bring to the light" all irregularities, so the Colombian people may see the real magnitude of the links between the political power and the paramilitary forces.

 

However, barely a few days before the main AUC commanders were to testify in court, the president arranged for their transfer from the La Ceja recreational center to the Itagüi maximum-security prison. According to the government, the step was taken because the paramilitaries allegedly were planning to escape. Also, according to official sources, the men may have been responsible for the deaths of some of their aides, to keep them from making compromising statements to the prosecutors.

 

Uribe himself warned Salvatore Mancuso and company that if they "misbehaved" he might withdraw the legal benefits they enjoy thanks to the peace agreement signed in April 2002. That announcement led the governments of the U.S. and Italy to express interest in the extradition of the main leader of the AUC, who was sentenced in Colombia to 40 years' imprisonment for the deaths of several peasants.

 

However, by pleading the protection of the Colombian "Law for Justice and Peace," Mancuso got his sentence reduced to only five years' imprisonment.

 

Contrary to the official version, Attorney General Mario Iguarán said that there is "no element or information that allows us at present to reasonably infer that [the AUC detainees] were planning an escape or that they arranged for the murder of other persons." The transfer of the men to Itagüi resulted in the paramilitaries breaking up relations with the government.

 

To attempt to solve the conflict afflicting Uribe's administration and revive the dialogue, mediators from the Roman Catholic Church and the Organization of American States (OAS) decided to meet with AUC representatives. According to Msgr. Luis Augusto Castro, it is necessary to write an official document to prevent any short-circuits in the peace agreement.

 

"This has been difficult, and the self-defense forces unilaterally broke relations because they felt trampled on and deceived," Msgr. Castro said. "We must write things down and show them to the country, so people may know what was promised and what agreements were reached." Also, the people must make sure "that both sides [in the talks] will fulfill their commitments," he added.

 

At this point, it is valid to ask whether President Uribe's attitude is contradictory or not. On one hand, he says he is "in favor of bringing everything to the light." On the other, he implements an intimidating measure just before the paramilitary commanders have to testify in court -- knowing full well that the paramilitaries had announced their intention to reveal all their links to the political power.

 

Could this be considered as a desperate threat that seeks to censure the principal leaders of the AUC and thus keep the Mafia connections of the political system from coming to light?

 

In a communiqué titled "For Colombia To Be Reborn," the Army of National Liberation (ELN) stated that both the Colombian oligarchy and the United States are guilty of spawning a paramilitary monster "that is responsible for the genocide of half a million of our compatriots and the displacement of four million others."

 

The guerrilla group claims that the "narco-paramilitaries" have taken over the regional administrations, penetrated the police forces and important sectors of the executive branch. It also stated that Plan Colombia fails as a repressive element because it attempts "to restrain the popular uprising through state-sponsored terrorism."

 

Finally, the ELN guerrillas stressed the need to create a new institutionality by means of a Constituent process. Undoubtedly, this idea is very interesting, because it can allow the refounding of a political system that (as everyone knows) is thoroughly infected by corruption and links to criminal organizations.

 

Obviously, the principal opponent of this initiative -- an initiative that could lead to an end of the crisis afflicting Colombia -- is President Uribe, who, by resorting to contradictions, will try to confuse the Colombian people in an effort to perpetuate himself in power.

 

From APM, the Mercosur Press Agency.

 

 

 

 

 


E-mail this page
 
Print this article
 
Back to top