Week of

 

Dec. 21  to
Dec. 27, 2006

 
 
Progreso Semanal
Lea la versión en español
 
 

 

 

 

Eye on Miami

Features

Links

Suggested readings

Your letters

Bulletin Board

Previous editions

Progreso Weekly©

 
Copyright 2007
© Progreso Weekly, Inc.
 

 
Back to top
 
 

Please join us by subscribing to Progreso Weekly and Progreso Semanal. It's free and easy :      


HOME               LISTEN              ABOUT US              SEARCH             TO EDITOR            TAKE ACTION             CONTRIBUTE


Lea la versión en Español

Print this article   -   E-mail this page


El discurso de Bush

Going, going, gone -- John Bolton

 

By Juana Carrasco Martín

Juventud Rebelde

 

We're not talking about baseball, so this is not a home run. What's gone is (finally!) John Bolton, the ambassador-designate to the United Nations, hand-picked by George W. Bush during a Congressional recess because the legislators never gave him a passing grade.

 

The man with the face of a growling dog has resigned, knowing that neither this Congress, which ends its session this month, nor the one that takes over in January were going to approve him.

 

Another hawk takes flight after the Republican defeat at the polls on Nov. 7, because Donald Rumsfeld also turned in his letter of resignation. But many more hawks remain in the Bushian nest.

 

Bolton leaves, carrying under his arm quite a number of failures, in addition to his explosive statements inside the U.N. to defend the interests of the United States against much of the planet, particularly the underdeveloped countries.

 

And we cannot forget that earlier he did a lot to discredit the world organization (remember when he said that if ten floors of the U.N. building in New York disappeared, "nothing would happen.")

 

Remember, too, the flood of votes in favor of the General Assembly resolution that condemned, for the 15th consecutive time, the U.S. blockade against Cuba; his inability, despite his arm-twisting, to impose Guatemala as Washington's candidate to the Security Council, so as to block Venezuela's bid. And he couldn't stall the administrative reform at the world body so it would serve solely and exclusively to foment a world to Washington's liking.

 

Only by exercising the United States' veto power, Bolton managed to contain a resolution condemning Israel for its crimes against the Palestinian people in Beit Hanoun. And when the resolution was brought before the General Assembly, it earned the approval of a broad majority, demonstrating that, despite their wishes and willfulness, the United States and Bolton couldn't always get away with their plans.

 

Of course, the U.S. had exercised its veto before, also to stop another resolution against the Israeli aggressions in occupied Palestinian lands. However, with premeditation, Bolton called for an early solution to the war Israel unleashed on Lebanon, de facto permitting the destruction of Lebanon's economy and infrastructure, in addition to the mowing of hundreds of lives, mostly Lebanese civilians.

 

And the list could include several other instances that have lit fires in this convulsed planet. As U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan said, Bolton "did the job he was expected to do." That is why the White House bemoaned, unashamedly: "He was a successful ambassador at the U.N.," and added, weeping: "We are in mourning because he was not rewarded and honored" for that.

 

"Total tranquility" reigns in the steel-and-glass building by the East River in Manhattan, the news agencies reported. Bolton -- whom many had described as a bull in a china shop -- entered the U.N. by the rear door and left it the same way.

 

 

 

 

 

 


E-mail this page
 
Print this article
 
Back to top