Al’s Loupe

‘Anybody But Bush’ won’t cut it
 

By Alvaro F. Fernandez

The latest poll numbers demonstrate that President George W. Bush does better the worse things get. With a 49 to 43 percent disadvantage (with Ralph Nader registering 6 percent), Democratic Party contender John F. Kerry seems to have withered during April.

This decline occurring during a month when W’s War on Iraq has reached its worst moment (to this point); the U.S. economy still dangles perilously; former terrorist boss Richard Clarke made the president appear to use terrorism – especially after September 11, 2001 – as a political tool by ignoring signs of upcoming tragedies; and to top it off, the president’s National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice brilliantly teetered on the legal edge of more than one lie during her testimony before the commission investigating 9-11.

And sure there was more, but with what I have just described you would have thought that John Kerry would be swinging for the fences, as was suggested by columnist Arianna Huffington in last week’s Progreso Weekly. Instead, the American public is still asking itself: and who the hell is John F. Kerry and what does he really stand for?

Click here to read the entire Al’s Loupe

 

B.S Detector

The wrong

approach 

An honest mistake is one thing. A dishonest “mistake” with ulterior motives is quite something else. Let us illustrate. 


John F. Kerry


On Monday April 19, El Nuevo Herald published a Page One story headlined “Kerry in Miami criticizes Bush's foreign policy // There must be an ‘approximation’ with the Castro regime, he says” that said the Democratic presidential candidate, interviewed on NBC's Meet the Press, “said he opposes the lifting of the trade embargo against the island, but believes there must be some kind of communication and conversations with the government of Fidel Castro, and suggested easing the travel of Americans and the remittance of money to Cuba.”

 Click here to read why we call it BS

Democracy fails disenchanted Latin Americans

By Max Castro
Latin Americans are so disenchanted with the failure of democracy to deliver a better life that a clear majority (54.7 percent) is willing to support an authoritarian government if it would solve their economic problems. 

A story by Tyler Bridges in the April 22 edition of The Miami Herald reported that stunning finding. It is based on public opinion surveys in 18 Latin American countries carried out by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), which has just released an extensive study on the state of democracy in the region (htpp://democracia.undp.org/informe). 

Why have Latin Americans lost faith in democracy? Is it the fault of bad leaders, “an adolescent political culture,” or corruption, as the Bush administration and our local pundits consistently imply? 

There definitely is something gravely wrong when there is such a high level of disillusion with democracy among people who for decades suffered the depredations of dictatorship. But the main causes lie elsewhere. What is wrong is the accumulated frustration of a quarter century during which the standard of living has worsened for tens of millions of Latin Americans. This comes at a time when aspirations have soared among an increasingly educated, urban, and youthful Latin American population plugged into the world.  

Democracy, the retreat of the state in favor of the market, the privatization of nearly everything, the opening of the Latin American economy to foreign investment and imports, were supposed to bring prosperity. Many of these neoliberal capitalist measures would be painful, the people were told, but there would be a reward at the end of the road. 

Latin Americans were patient. For a long time, they gave the new policies a chance to show results. Now the results are in, and Latin Americans have lost their patience. The reasons are not difficult to divine. In 1980, as military juntas began to give way to elected governments, 40.5 percent of Latin Americans were poor. By 2003, Latin American poverty had increased to 43.9 percent of a much larger population. These figures don't reflect fully the rise in inequality during the same period. Yet, as their own fortunes declined, the growing legions of the poor and the sinking middle classes were keenly aware of the increasing opulence of a few.

Click here for entire Max Castro column
 

Click to register to vote here!

 

IN BLACK AND WHITE

Molly Ivins writes in The Progressive Magazine:

“Robert Novak is quoted as saying in all his forty-four years of covering politics, he has never seen anything like the detestation of Bush.”



E-mail this page
 
Print this article
 
Back to top
 
Saturday May 18, 2013
 
Our Pulse:
South Florida
 
ALVARO F. FERNANDEZ
Al’s Loupe
'Anybody But Bush' won’t cut it
 
MAX CASTRO
Democracy fails, disenchants
 
B.S. DETECTOR
The wrong approach
 
 
In the United States
 
SAUL LANDAU
Elections and imperialists
 
DANICA WEBB
Washington Vibes – LAWG
Afro-Colombians in bad position
 
MARK ENGLER
Unhappy birthday, World Bank!
 
ARIANNA HUFFINGTON
How White House led us to war
 
MATTHEW MILLER
J. Kerry: I approve this message
 
BILL PRESS
Read Bob Woodward’s book
 
 
Neighbors to the South
 
MARCELO LARREA
Lucio’s fate gets complicated
 
LATIN AMERICAN SUMMARY
Fox denied OK for award
 
 
Our World
 
JACOBO QUINTANILLA
New lesson in U.S. standards
 
 
Life
 
LITA RUIZ
Eating with Dońa Lita
Stuffed potatoes
 
 
   
From Previous Issues
 
Blockade detrimental to the US
By Carlos Iglesias
 
Chile & L. America militarization
By Eduardo Dimas
 
A warning or old data?
Controversial Memo
 
'If anyone dissents separately'
By Manuel Alberto Ramy
 
Corruption & social exclusion
By Jacobo Quintanilla
 
The CIA's plan against Mexico
By Jesus Arboleya Cervera
 
A foretold media manipulation
By Alexa G. Weber
 
Transition from neoliberalism?
By Raul Zibecchi
 
Who is really telling the truth?
New American Century
 
Peace movement 1 year later
By Mark Engler
 
What... starve them to death?
By Alexa G. Weber
 
Europe & the elections in Spain
By Eduardo Dimas
 
Trade lessons for the Americas
By Sarah Anderson
 
Caution! Democracies in danger
By Adolfo Perez Esquivel
 
Two calls from La Moncloa
By Antonio Franco
 
An interview with Frei Betto
By Sergio Ferrari
 
Ira Kurzban interview on Haiti
By Francisco Aruca
 
A Correspondent's Draft
Venezuela: Letter to a friend
By Manuel Alberto Ramy
 
Four legs of a campaign
By Lorenzo Quijano
 
Interview with Evo Morales
By Oscar Gutierrez
 
No imminent threat
By CIA Director Geo. TENET
 
'We thought he had weapons'
Pres. Bush Interview
 
Iraq invasion was a mistake
By War College Institute
 
Back to top
 





 


 

Copyright 2007© Progreso Weekly, Inc.